Are neo-libs finally taking notice

Are neo-libs finally taking notice?

The American people is holding another spewer (Rossie O’Donnel) accountable. Freedom of speech is one of our greatest rights, but with that come responsibility. Neo-Libs you too will be exposed one by one and shut down. Dissent is needed and necessary, but dishonest dissent is not tolerated by rational people, regardless of what side of the political isle you are on. Another example, I watch the segment on The Factor today, Bill once again was able to prove with facts, and did in fact expose Bill Moyer for being the dishonest spewer of misinformation that he is. He showed video of Moyers program were Moyers took several comments of Bill O’Reillys News analysis program out of context and made Bill out to be some Right wing nut. Bill Then played the entire segments unedited and put his comments into full context, which clearly showed a very modest, independent view of the subject madder.

Other Answers:

Bill is a right wing nut, and if you really cared about honest dissent, you would not support him or Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, etc.

YES FREEDOM OF SPEECH COMES WITH RESPONSIBILITY ....LIKE THE LIES BUSCO TOLD TO GET US INTO A WAR ...HE WAS FREE TO USE THEM....BUT WHERE IS THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE OUTCOME OF HIS LIES....ITS A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD PAL ... AND RESPONSIBILITY SHOULD BE PRACTICED BY ALL

Nobody like Rosie, get over it.

"He showed video of Moyers program were Moyers took several comments of Bill O’Reillys News analysis program out of context"

Hello pot, meet keetle.

"and made Bill out to be some Right wing nut."

He is.

"Bill Then played the entire segments unedited and put his comments into full context, which clearly showed a very modest, independent view of the subject madder."

You mean he put his own spin on it and once again showed himself to be right wing nut.

Edit: This is too easy
"Why did Moyers do this, why do other left winger bash, because if you are not 100% in agreement with their ideology, they consider you their enemy and will smear, and go after you regardless of truth"

pot meet keetle...oh you two already know each other?

While one dictator, the former CIA asset, Saddam Hussein, was executed after the illegal occupation of Iraq, another dictatorship and oppressive monarchy next door in Saudi Arabia is embraced. Saddam bucked neoliberalism by nationalizing Iraq's oil industry, while the House of Saud embraces and is a major player in it. It is interesting to note, that while Iraq accepted and played along with neoliberalism, Saddam Hussein, was allowed to run his country any way that he wanted. Saddam's torture and gassing mattered not as long Saddam played by neoliberalism's rules. History records the brutal march of globalization:

Globalization was brought to the many at the “point of a gun”, and many were “globalized” literally kicking and screaming, from Commodore's Perry ultimatum which opened Japan, to British and French gunboat diplomacy in Tunisia, Egypt and Zanzibar, to the Opium wars and gunboats that patrolled Chinese internal waterways. And, worst of all, for many millions who were sold in slavery, or who toiled sixteen hours a day on plantations from Malaya to Brazil that too was globalization. Globalization was not merely accompanied by the worst excesses of colonialism; colonialism was not an accident. On the contrary, globalization was colonialism because it is through being colonies that most of the non-European nations were brought to the global world. (The Two Faced of Globalization, Against Globalization As We know It, Banko Milanovic, Development Research Group, Wold Bank).